Thursday, October 30, 2025

1 Hour Band Search 12pm to 1pm - 29/10/2025

Yesterday I undertook a 1 hour band search session, this is where for an hour, I log any signals, both voice and data. Below is a break down of this.

30 to 45MHZ - Lots of splatter. Some paging signals around 40MHz

134.75 AIS
160.09 - Tasgrn / tasrail splater
162.38 - tasrail
163.84 - Data
164.875 - Data
404.875 - Data
405.0 - TFS Alarm Tones
413.825 - Data
414.325 - Data
451.3 - Data

476.85 - UHF CB TIP
126.5 - ATC
474.775 - UTAS (DMR)
123.8 - ATC
413.35 - Data
162.5 - Boral
464.275 - METRO Abels Hill
464.375 - METRO Free lands Lookout
162.6125 - TASRAIL
127.3 - ATC 
162.375 - TASRAIL
454.275 - METRO Input
118.7 - ATC Launceston Tower
158 - Tasrail

Wednesday, October 29, 2025

Close Call vs Frequency Counter – October 2025 Field Test

Testing Location: Home backyard
Date: October 2025
Equipment:

  • Uniden BC125AT (Close Call feature)

  • Baofeng UV-17 (Frequency Counter mode)

  • TX Source: 0.5W UHF CB handheld locked on Channel 80 (477.4125 MHz)


The Test

This backyard experiment was designed to compare how quickly and accurately two popular handheld radios can detect nearby transmissions — the Uniden BC125AT using its Close Call feature, and the Baofeng UV-17 using its built-in frequency counter.

A low-power UHF CB radio was used as the signal source, transmitting continuously on 477.4125 MHz (Channel 80). Both receivers were placed side by side at various distances to see which one would pick up the signal first.


The Results

The Uniden BC125AT consistently had the edge, triggering a Close Call hit about 2.5 meters earlier than the Baofeng UV-17 detected the same signal.

This confirms that Uniden’s Close Call system — which is purpose-built for near-field signal detection — remains faster and more sensitive at identifying strong, nearby transmitters compared to the Baofeng’s frequency counter, which relies on slower signal sampling.


Takeaway

If you’re hunting for unknown local transmitters or doing field monitoring, Close Call still wins for speed and reliability.

The Baofeng’s counter is handy in a pinch, but it’s more of a convenience tool — not a dedicated near-field receiver.

Still, it’s great to see both radios perform well in the test, especially in a simple home setup using everyday gear.


🎥 Watch the video: Close Call and Frequency Mode Testing – October 2025



Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Extreme Scanning Story - The 509MHz Connection


It was late — the kind of late where the streets are empty, and the hum of distant transformers fills the silence. I was staying overnight in the same city as an industrial area, about 200 km from home. Work had me stationed not far from the head office of a company that also operates a major site near where I live.


A few months earlier, I’d been combing through the ACMA database and stumbled across a handful of UHF frequencies licensed to the company. Strangely, I’d never logged any activity from them at home — dead air every time I checked. That got me thinking: maybe they only use them locally, near their main base of operations.

So, scanner packed, ScannerFreakDB ready on my phone, and coffee in hand, I decided to find out.

Night One
From the hotel, I set up my gear by the window overlooking the industrial estate. The scanner ran all night, CloseCall enabled, antenna pointed roughly toward the cluster of buildings where the company operated. Nothing. Not a blip, not a burst, not even a stray carrier.

It was disappointing, but I wasn’t ready to give up.

Night Two
This time, I decided to get up close and personal.

Just after midnight, I drove out to the edge of their facility — a maze of chain-link fencing, floodlights, and the occasional movement of forklifts in the distance. CloseCall was armed and scanning hard.

I might have gone right up to the gate. And I
might have claimed to be lost, asking the guard if “Dave” — a completely random name — was working that night. It worked better than expected. The guard picked up his radio to check, and right then my scanner lit up — 509.XXXX MHz with a CTCSS tone of XX.X Hz.

Bingo.

That single moment confirmed it: their UHF system was active, just quiet unless directly used. I stayed in the area for another hour, tuning the upper end of the band, where I soon uncovered two more channels — one clearly used for
site services chatter, and another for operations.

The Real Twist
When I got home a few days later, curiosity got the better of me. I tuned those same frequencies again, just to see.

To my surprise, they were alive — same frequencies, but with different CTCSS tones. The same company, same equipment, but separate tone setups for each site.

That night proved it: the frequencies listed in the ACMA DB weren’t just dead entries — they were part of a carefully segmented radio system spanning multiple sites, quietly linking operations across hundreds of kilometres.

And all it took to confirm it was a late-night drive, a little curiosity, and being “accidentally lost” at just the right gate.

Tuesday, October 14, 2025

UBC126AT Key Press Codes



** Press and hold these keys as you turn the radio on **

2 + 9 + Hold = Factory Reset

1 = Country Mode Australia

2= Country Mode New Zealand

Hold + 3 = Set Contrast

Hold + 4 = Frequency counter mode (Use rotary knob to change bands)

Hold + 5 = USB PORT TEST

Hold + 6 = Key / screen test - shows on the screen which keys are pressed.

Hold + 7 = Load Test Data - search bank 6

Hold + 8 = Load Test Data - search bank 6

Hold + 9 = Load Test Data - search bank 9

Scan + 1 = Frequency counter mode (Use rotary knob to change bands)

Srch + 1 = Load Test Data - search bank 6

Scan + 3 = Key / screen test - shows on the screen which keys are pressed.

Scan + 4 = Load Test Data - search bank 1

Scan + 7 = Load Test Data - search bank 7

Scan + 8 = Load Test Data - search bank 7

Scan + 9 = Load Test Data - search bank 0

Scan + 0 = Load Test Data - CH401 - 404 / Adjust Voltage

Srch + any number key = Load Test Data

L/O + 5 = Load test Data - search bank 1

L/O + 6 = Turn on LCD backlight (remove batteries to turn off)

L/O + 7 = Load test Data - scan bank 1

L/O + 8 = Load test Data - scan bank 1

E + 1 = Factory Reset / Country Mode Australia

E + 2 = Factory Reset / Country Mode New Zealand

Friday, October 10, 2025

When the Problem Isn’t Software: The Lesson of the Faulty Cable

We’ve all been there — sitting at the computer, eyes glazed over after hours (or days) of troubleshooting. You’ve installed and uninstalled drivers, rebooted more times than you can count, swapped USB ports, and even tried different computers. The forums are open in ten tabs, each suggesting a slightly different version of the same fix.

And yet… nothing works.

That was me this week — four computers, multiple driver packages, different versions of software, and even a few suspect registry tweaks later. The problem persisted. I was convinced it had to be a compatibility issue, some obscure setting, or maybe a dodgy Windows update. I was helping out somebody who I had programmed a radio for a few years ago (back on Windows 7).

Except it wasn’t.

After all that effort, I tried one last thing: a different cable.
And just like that — instant success.

No drivers, no reboots, no hacks. Just a working connection.


The Hidden Weak Link

It’s amazing how often the most basic component in a setup is the one we overlook. We assume cables are fine because they look fine. The insulation isn’t cracked, the connectors are clean, and it clicks into place with confidence. But inside, a single broken wire or cheap connector can bring everything to a halt.

Not all cables are equal, either. Some are data-only, others are power-only. Some are built to spec, others barely meet it. Especially with USB cables, the difference between “charging” and “data” can be the difference between hours of frustration and instant success. In this case the cable was working to "charge" the radio, but not "program" it.


What This Experience Taught Me

  1. Start with the simplest thing first. Before diving into drivers, check the basics — cable, port, power, connections.

  2. Label your cables. If you find one that’s data-capable and reliable, mark it. You’ll thank yourself later. In this case, the cable was the same one that was used to program this radio, 8 years ago.

  3. Don’t trust looks alone. A cable can look "good" and still be internally damaged or of poor quality.

  4. Keep a known-good cable handy. It’s one of the best troubleshooting tools you can own.


The Takeaway

The next time you find yourself knee-deep in drivers, forums, and firmware updates, take a step back and ask:
“Have I tried a different cable?”

It might sound too simple to be the answer — but sometimes, it really is.

Sunday, October 5, 2025

Non-Scientific Aerial Testing: A Quick Look at Reception Performance

Recently, I carried out a little backyard experiment to test how different types of antennas perform when receiving various radio frequencies. It wasn't a lab-controlled environment, nor was it strictly scientific—but it was practical, fun, and surprisingly informative.

The Setup

Location: Home, radio desk.

Tested Equipment:

  • UBC-73XLT (Standard Antenna): A general-purpose handheld scanner

  • TV Rabbit Ears: The classic indoor adjustable antenna—nothing fancy. Added a BNC connector.

  • VHF Marine Antenna: Typically used on boats; designed for marine VHF but tested here for broader reception. Roof-mounted at ~3 meters off the ground



Each antenna was tested for signal reception quality across various frequencies from the Tasmanian Government Radio Network (TASGRN), TasRail, and some data services. Ratings were on a basic 0–5 scale, representing relative signal strength and clarity:    

  • 0: No signal

  • 5: Excellent reception

SITE: UBC-73XLT - Standard / TV Rabbit Ears Aerial / VHF Marine - 3M off ground on roof
FrequencyDescriptionUBC-73XLTTV Rabbit EarsVHF Marine
165.1375TasRail Abels Hill555
165.725TASGRN Browns Hill023
166.55TASGRN Mt Barrow445
166.9625TASGRN Kellys Lookout003
167.5125TASGRN Mt Dismal455
421.4875TASGRN Abels Hill455
421.950TASGRN West Launceston345
464.150Data Invermay455
TOTAL243036
AVG33.754.5
 
Red = VHF Sites
Black = UHF Sites
Green = My Location


Takeaways

This test reinforced a common truth in radio: antenna choice matters more than your receiver. Even a high-quality scanner can be let down by a poor antenna. If you're relying on a stock antenna for critical reception—especially in rural or fringe areas—you’re likely missing out on a lot.

The VHF Marine antenna proved to be the best all-rounder in this setup. Mounted just 3 meters above ground, it provided clear and strong reception across the board. If you're into scanning and have the space to mount something outdoors, it’s worth considering a purpose-built antenna—even one designed for marine use.


Final Thoughts

While this wasn't a lab test, and environmental variables weren’t controlled, the results are still quite telling. If you're using a handheld or base scanner and wondering why your reception is lacking, start by looking up—your antenna might be the real bottleneck.